State House News

On behalf of my members, their families and the students and communities we serve, I urge you to vote NO on HB 1815 because it harms Granite State public school students and pushes unsustainable costs onto local property taxpayers.

HB 1815 redefines “adequate education” by tying it to a specific list of subjects in the school‑approval standards, limiting what the state is obligated to fund. It also declares that decisions about raising, allocating, and spending education dollars are a “political policy matter” reserved to the legislative and executive branches, limiting judicial oversight that has historically protected students’ constitutional right to an adequate education.

We all share the goal of transparency and good financial management of taxpayer money, especially when it comes to our public schools because we know that any misspent money is lost education opportunities for our public-school students. However, we strongly oppose HB 121 because it goes too far and poses significant dangers to the educational opportunities of public-school students throughout New Hampshire, especially those in our small, rural, property poor school districts.

HB 121 imposes unfunded mandates, ones that small and rural districts cannot absorb. HB 121 dramatically tightens audit requirements; mandates professionally conducted audits with an inflexible one‑year deadline and requires full publication of findings. These new compliance demands come without funding to help districts implement them.

I want to express our concerns that HB 1669, while well‑intentioned and filled with kind sentiments, fails to address the real, urgent needs in many of our Granite State public schools.

This bill, HB 1669, offers aspirations, not action. It lays out a “Teacher Bill of Rights” including statements about safe schools, civility, respect, and professional autonomy. However, these provisions are just statements of principles without requiring any district, administrator, or policymaker to make concrete improvements. The bill lists rights such as a “safe and healthy school environment” and the expectation of “civility and respect”, but it includes no mechanisms to create, fund, or enforce those conditions.

On behalf of our members, their families and the people they serve, I respectfully urge you to vote Inexpedient to Legislate on CACR 28.

CACR 28 would repeal and reenact Article 6 of the New Hampshire Constitution to authorize towns, parishes, bodies corporate, and religious societies to elect and contract with public Protestant teachers of piety, religion and morality, grounding public instruction in evangelical principles. It also provides additional constitutional protections only to Christian denominations. These changes conflict with the existing Article 6, which guarantees equal protection for all faiths and prohibits subordination of one sect to another.

We want to express our serious concerns with SB 434. While it appears simply to call for all districts to have complaint procedures for reconsideration of library and other school materials, its impact would be much broader. As written, the bill endangers students’ access to information, undermines educators’ professional judgment, and invites constitutional challenges that will distract districts from teaching and learning.

We urge you to find HB 1792 Inexpedient to Legislate. The bill is unconstitutional and would significantly damage student learning conditions in New Hampshire.

HB 1792 harms students’ right to an honest, complete education. It censors core content and prohibits teaching methods required by state standards. New Hampshire’s Minimum Standards for Public School Approval (Ed 306) require districts to deliver comprehensive, competency‑based instruction that develops critical thinking and analysis in social studies, civics, English language arts, and other content areas. Teachers routinely use scholarly frameworks to guide students in analyzing primary sources, literature, and historical movements, as well as to demonstrate required competencies. HB 1792 would limit these practices, making it harder for districts to meet Ed 306’s expectations for rigorous, standards‑aligned instruction.”

We strenuously oppose HB 1778. New Hampshire has already seen the consequences of passing vague, speech‑restricting laws targeting discussions of identity, race, gender, and discrimination. This bill repeats those same errors and does so in direct contradiction to the federal court ruling in Local 8027, AFT‑NH v. Edelblut (2024), which struck down the state’s previous “divisive concepts” law. In addition, HB 1778 recycles the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion prohibitions from RSA 186:72, a statute already under injunction for violating constitutional rights, and tries to make them law again.”